Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Wallace v. Kiefer
as 4:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Neal C. Wallace
Defendant:
Edward F. Kiefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Brees v. Neal
as 5:2023cv05073
Plaintiff:
Colleen Brees
Defendant:
Allison Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rhorer v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03141
Plaintiff:
Neal Rhorer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Hedlund et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02682
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Hedlund, Nicholas Selm, Nicholas Osvatic and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Holding, LLC, Aearo Intermediate, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Neal v. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
as 4:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
James Neal
Defendant:
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Kennedy v. Kristiansen et al
as 3:2023cv05005
Plaintiff:
Phillip Kevin Kennedy
Defendant:
Kari Kristiansen, Neal Quitno and Chief Lechner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Casey Copeland, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 23-1172
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Casey Copeland, Vaughn Scher, Mustafa Sultan and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Johnson v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv03105
Plaintiff:
Neal Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wilson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Neal Wilson
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Boland et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00766
Plaintiff:
Carol Mangione, Belinda Luna, Vickie Morris and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Royston, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
