Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mitchell v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Connie S. Mitchell
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McDowell v. United Parcel Service, Inc., et al
as 4:2022cv04028
Plaintiff:
William McDowell
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. d/b/a UPS; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO.; UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, United Parcel Service, Inc. doing business as UPS, United Parcel Service Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
***CASE ABANDONED - SEE 21-03181-CV-S-RK - DUPLICATE CASE OPENED IN ERROR*** Kasper v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 6:2021cv03180
Plaintiff:
Robert Kasper
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kasper v. United Parcel Service Inc.
as 6:2021cv03181
Plaintiff:
Robert Kasper
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc. and Joshua M Dampier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barbee v. Newsom et al
as 6:2019cv03370
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Cornelius Newsom
Plaintiff:
Brittany Barbee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
Patrick Schmidt and Linda Schmidt
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Files v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv04060
Plaintiff:
Jason Files
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Myrtis Easter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaiser v. United Parcel Service, Inc - See #9 Order dismissing parties
as 6:2015cv02052
Plaintiff:
MaryJo Kaiser
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Tolle et al
as 2:2015cv04135
Plaintiff:
Virginia Coleman
Defendant:
James Tolle and United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2012cv02264
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Samantha W.S. Newman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
