Cases 101 - 110 of 6,902
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rogers v. Columbia County et al
as 1:2024cv01036
Defendant:
Columbia County, Jesse Guise, Nurse Cassandra and others
Plaintiff:
Randy DeWayne Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allender v. Heber Springs Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv00504
Defendant:
Heber Springs Police Department and Trey Jackson
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bradford Allender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Link et al v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2024cv04063
Defendant:
Does 1 through 5, inclusive, Peter Ferrara, Jonathan Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Link and Thomas Link
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Jones v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Defendant:
Latonya Honorable and Arkansas Insurance Department
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
