Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Kirn v. Tuff Shed, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01172
Plaintiff:
Mark Kirn
Defendant:
Tuff Shed, Inc. , Garrett Maun and Kirk Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Hunter v. Rodebaugh et al
as 4:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Hunter
Defendant:
Mark Rodebaugh, Sam Dotson, Sue Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv02041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Love v. Piatchek, et al.
as 4:2014cv01830
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Love
Defendant:
Paul Piatchek , Mathew Karnowski , Marcus Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maberry et al v. Vescovo et al
as 4:2014cv00914
Defendant:
Paul Vescovo, III , Matthew Hunter , Clay County Sheriffs Department and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren A Maberry and Linda Jepsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens et al v. Davis and Goldmark et al
as 6:2013cv03311
Plaintiff:
Terry David Owens
Defendant:
Davis and Goldmark, Marie Blancarte, Jim Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ehlen et al v. Carnahan
as 6:2012cv03122
Defendant:
Robin Carnahan and State of Missouri Attorney General Office
Plaintiff:
Beverly Ehlen , Mik Chester , Robert W Wood and others
Intervenor:
Molly Teichman and State of Missouri Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Salem, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Anaka Hunter
Defendant:
Salem, Missouri, City of , Board of Trustees, Salem Public Library and Glenda Woffard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCain v. Kansas City Missouri et al
as 4:2011cv01221
Defendant:
Kansas City Missouri , Kansas City Missouri Board of Police Commissioners, Darryl Forte and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos C McCain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
