Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Jonathan Lee Riches v. Dirk Kempthorne, et al
as 08-3473
Plaintiff:
Philip N. Geenen
Movant - Appellant:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant - Appellee:
Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary of Interior, or his successor, Annette Wheeler, Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Deri Young, Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management and others
Inez Hunter v. Barry Johnson
as 08-2659
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Inez Hunter
Defendant - Appellee:
Barry Johnson
Defendant:
Woodbury Community Land Trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv01053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Neighborhood Enterprises, et al v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 07-3673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Sanctuary in the Ordinary and Jim Roos
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis Redevelopment Corporation, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv03387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc., Neighborhood Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
St. Louis, City of, St. Louis Development Corporation, Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Epice Corporation v. Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, The et al
as 4:2007cv00206
Plaintiff:
Epice Corporation and Epice Corporation
Defendant:
Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, The, Land Reutilization Authority of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, The, James W. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
