Cases 61 - 70 of 642
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00284
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Lindsey et al v. Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv06113
Plaintiff:
Michael Lindsey and Marquesa Lindsey
Defendant:
Oaklawn Jockey Club, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Winningham v. Seiders et al
as 4:2022cv01043
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Defendant:
Scott Seiders, Mark Pate, Rebecca McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00259
Defendant:
McGregor, Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
John v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
J David John
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Douglas Schrantz, Kristin L Pawlik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Kusper v. Drale et al
as 4:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kusper
Defendant:
Christina Drale, Gregory Guisbiers, Brian Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Scott v. Cox et al
as 5:2022cv05151
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Allen Scott
Defendant:
Tyler Cox, Thomas Plummer, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Cox et al
as 6:2022cv06086
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Allen Scott
Defendant:
Tyler Cox, Thomas Plummer, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
