Cases 71 - 80 of 151
Suarez v. Pulaski County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jessica Linda Suarez
Defendant:
Pulaski County, Arkansas , Doc Holladay and Scott Hazel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elliott et al v. Shock et al
as 4:2015cv00786
Plaintiff:
Dalton Elliott , Gary Scott Manning and Alicia Hardy
Defendant:
Andy Shock and Matt Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Deleon et al
as 2:2015cv02193
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Scott
Defendant:
Justin Deleon, Dewey Young, Steven Creek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thornton v. Stuttgart, City of et al
as 5:2015cv00303
Plaintiff:
Seneca Thornton
Defendant:
Stuttgart, City of, Arkansas Municipal League, Stuttgart Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Viele et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
David Viele , Beth Viele and Beth's Bail Bonds Inc
Defendant:
Larry E Peters , Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board , Curt Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Scott II v. United States Department of Labor and Education
as 4:2015cv00446
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott II
Defendant:
United States Department of Labor and Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick v. City of Rogers, Arkansas et al
as 5:2015cv05120
Plaintiff:
Darrell Frederick
Defendant:
City of Rogers, Arkansas, Vince Motsinger, Nick Torkelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philpott et al v. Drug Enforcement Agency et al
as 2:2015cv02017
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott Philpott
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Bureau of Narcotics and All Arkansas Police Departments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroggin v. Cameron et al
as 5:2014cv05380
Plaintiff:
James Michael Scroggin
Defendant:
David Cameron , Randy Atkinson , Dennis Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
