Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Vincent Cannady v. MO Dept. of Mental Health, et al
as 22-1991
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent Cannady
Defendant / Appellee:
Missouri Department of Mental Health, Brian C. Wimes, Office of Administration and others
Defendant:
David S Baker, Fisher, Patterson, Sayler & Smith, Hugh C. Jenkins and others
Cannady v. Department of Mental Health, State of Missouri et al
as 3:2021cv05038
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health, State of Missouri, Jane Doe, Joe Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Cannady
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415
Yohn v. Comprehensive Mental Health and Research Psychiatric Center et al
as 4:2019cv00438
Defendant:
Kerri Donovan, Comprehensive Mental Health, Dr. Rajendra Paladugu and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy D. Yohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv04201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Summers et al v. Second Chance Homes, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv04044
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Summers and Carol Samson
Defendant:
Second Chance Homes, LLC , Rachael Rowden , Sherry Paulo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Moreland v. Department of Mental Health et al
as 4:2016cv00910
Plaintiff:
Chad Moreland
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health, Metropolitan St. Louis Pyschiatric Center and Alaine Dimmett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1507
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
