Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 487
Humphrey v. Douglas Prosecuting Attorney We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv03135
Plaintiff: Thomas Edward Humphrey
Defendant: Douglas Prosecuting Attorney
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Johnson v. Stahl et al
as 0:2024cv01065
Plaintiff: Paul Edward Johnson
Defendant: Kevin Stahl, Tyler Johnson and Kevin Lease
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: Edward Lee Humes
Defendant: T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00944
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Humes v. Kansas City, MO Police Department
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff: Edward Lee Humes
Defendant: Kansas City, MO Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Gene Scott v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott
Defendant: U.S. Department of Agriculture
Michael Mattingly v. Marc McCune, et al
as 24-1372
Plaintiff: Michael Mattingly
Defendant: Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Aaron Edwards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Onnen v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Anthony J.E. Onnen and Anthony James Edward Onnen
Defendant: State of Iowa, Richard Diephuis, Trent L McFarland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?