Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
John Berman v. Paul Scott, et al
as 23-3062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John L. Berman
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Douglas Scott and John Does, 1-50
Berman v. Scott et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
John Lawrence Berman
Defendant:
Paul Scott, John Does 1-50 and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norwood v. Dickson et al
as 6:2018cv06124
Defendant:
John Doe, 1-50, The Malvern City Police Department, The Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Daniel Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicklas, et al v. Kelly, et al
as 4:2017cv03131
Defendant:
John Does (1-50), Joe Kelly and Lancaster County Attorney
Plaintiff:
Michelle Nicklas, Jane Roes (1-50) and John Roes (1-50)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Conn v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2012cv00075
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Jane Does 1-50, John Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Coty Conn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00074
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mehner Family Trust et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2010cv03009
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Department of Homeland Security, Jane Doe 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Andrea L. Mehner, Anthony Q. Mehner, Barbara A. Mehner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
