Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Jason Baucom v. George Lombardi, et al
as 16-1867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jason Riley Baucom
Plaintiff:
J.P.B., (deceased) and C.R.B., (deceased)
Defendant - Appellee:
George A. Lombardi, MO DOC Director, Brian Kinkade, Director MO Department of Social Services, Tim Decker, Director MO Department of Social Services/Children's Division and others
Marsh v. Spielman et al
as 1:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Demarkas Marsh
Defendant:
John C. Spielman, Jonce Chidister, Department of Social Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schuman et al v. Smith et al
as 5:2014cv04030
Plaintiff:
Stewart Schuman, Andrew M Clark, Harold Johnson and others
Defendant:
Jason Smith, CCUSO Administration, Mary Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Futscher v. Pettis County Juvenile Court et al
as 2:2012cv04280
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Scott Futscher
Defendant:
Pettis County Juvenile Court, Pettis County Juvenile Office and Missouri Department of Social Services, Pettis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dowty v. 6th - 7th Circuit Court et al
as 5:2012cv05039
Plaintiff:
Earl David Dowty
Defendant:
6th - 7th Circuit Court, City of Hot Springs, County of Fall River and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
R. v. Missouri, State of, et al
as 4:2012cv00956
Plaintiff:
K. R.
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Department of Social Services, Don Pokorny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiderlen v. USA
as 4:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davilla v. Jones, et al.
as 4:2007cv04177
Plaintiff:
Marcos A. Davilla
Defendant:
B. J. Jones, Department of Social Services and SWST Oyate Protection Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
