Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Wilbert Johnson v. Joe Paige, et al
as 15-3722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilbert Lezell Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Joe Paige, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Raylina Ramsey, Classification Officer, Grimes Unit, ADC, Aundrea Weekly, Warden.Grimes Unit, ADC and others
Peters v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City)
as 0:2015cv04083
Plaintiff:
Jameel Antonio Peters
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City), Thomas Roy , The Deputy Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessie Hill v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-2892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tuckr MSU, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, Internal Affairs and others
Benjamin Muhammad v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-1525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benjamin Muhammad
Plaintiff:
Adriene Tisdale, Tracy Kent Novak, Toby Robinson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Rory Griffin, Medical Director, William Straughn, Warden, Tucker Maximum Security Unit and others
Steven Shaw v. James Gibson, et al
as 15-1190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steven Shaw
Defendant - Appellee:
James Gibson, Assistant Warden, Delta Regional Unit, ADC, Lowe, Major, Delta Regional Unit, ADC, Linda Louis, Lieutenant, Delta Regional Unit, ADC and others
Michael Williams, et al v. State of Iowa, et al
as 14-3504
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Michael Terry Williams, "Williams-El" and James Lee Blair, "Blair-Bey"
Defendant - Appellant:
State of Iowa, The Iowa Department of Corrections, John Baldwin, Director of the Iowa Department of Corrections and others
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections Food Services Administrator
Thomas Ingrassia v. Carol Dicknette, et al
as 14-3358
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Director, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity, Felix Vincenz, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Comprehensive Psychiatric Services, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity, Julie Inman, Regional Executive Officer, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In Her Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Carol Dicknette, Office of Consumer Safety, Missouri Department of Mental Health, Jay Englehart, Psychiatrist/Physician, Medical Director, SORTS, In His Official and Individual Capacity, Alan Blake, Chief Operating Officer, SORTS, In His Official and Individual Capacity and others
Thomas Ingrassia v. Carol Dicknette, et al
as 13-3621
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant:
Keith Schafer, Director, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity, Felix Vincenz, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Comprehensive Psychiatric Services, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity, Julie Inman, Regional Executive Officer, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In Her Official Capacity and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Carol Dicknette, Office of Consumer Safety, Missouri Department of Mental Health, Alan Blake, Chief Operating Officer, SORTS, In HIs Official and Individual Capacity, Jay Englehart, Psychiatrist/Physician, Medical Director, SORTS, In His Official and Individual Capacity and others
Thomas Ingrassia v. Keith Schafer, et al
as 13-1308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas J. Ingrassia
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Schafer, Director, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity, Felix Vincenz, Chief Operating Officer, Division of Comprehensive Psychiatric Services, Missouri Department of Mental Health, In His Official Capacity, Jay Englehart, Physician/Psychiatrist, SORTS, In His Official and Individual Capacity and others
Wickner v. Rose et al
as 0:2012cv01397
Plaintiff:
Lance Wickner
Defendant:
Julie Rose, Thomas Lundquist, Katherine Klancher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
