Cases 31 - 40 of 622
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glidewell v. Bradley et al
as 2:2023cv04131
Plaintiff:
Shawn Alan Glidewell
Defendant:
Johnathon Bradley, Nathan Lexa, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parkhurst v. Centurion Medical Services et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
David A. Parkhurst
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Services, Sarah Finley and John & Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. City of Pike County et al
as 2:2023cv00033
Defendant:
Robert Embly, Jane Doe, City of Pike County and others
Plaintiff:
James Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graves v. Lt Brashers et al
as 6:2023cv03169
Plaintiff:
Anthony T Graves
Defendant:
Lt Brashers, Nurse Sheila, Billy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Cannon
Defendant:
Mike Jones, Carla Doe, Mark Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tipton v. Falkenrath, et al.
as 2:2023cv04096
Plaintiff:
Terel Tipton
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Matthew Todd, Jason Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weber v. Wheatley et al
as 2:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Weber
Defendant:
Tony Wheatley, Moniteau County, Missouri, John Doe I and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hileman v. Doe et al
as 4:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Paul Alan Hileman
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chamness v. Centurion et al
as 4:2023cv00449
Plaintiff:
William Ray Chamness
Defendant:
Centurion of Missouri, Laura Manford, Shanta Coffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
