Cases 31 - 40 of 104
Chestnut v. Rush City
as 0:2017cv00734
Petitioner:
Willie James Chestnut, Sr.
Respondent:
Rush City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hajny v. Harpool et al
as 6:2016cv03505
Plaintiff:
James Hajny
Defendant:
Douglas Harpool, Brian C Wimes and David Rush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David R. Carlson v. Jim Benson, et al
as 16-4010
Petitioner - Appellant:
David R. Carlson
Respondent - Appellee:
Jim Benson, Warden, Rush City Prison, Lori Swanson, Cory Reed, Duluth Parole Agent and others
Hull v. MN Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2016cv03505
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Hull
Defendant:
MN Department of Corrections, MCF - St. Cloud Medical/Mental Health and MCF - Rush City Medical/Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Seenyur v. Jennifer Lynne Coolidge
as 16-3828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Lee Johnson, Sr., also known as Antonio Seenyur
Defendant - Appellee:
Jennifer Lynne Coolidge, SOTP Program Director, Minnesota State Prison, Rush City, individually and in her official capacity
Rush v. Thurber
as 8:2016cv00170
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clifford Louis Rush
Respondent:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rush v. Bowersox
as 4:2016cv00298
Petitioner:
Jess Wayne Rush
Respondent:
Michael Bowersox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. Steve Hammer, et al
as 16-1347
Petitioner - Appellant:
Michael Frederick Schmidt
Respondent - Appellee:
Steve Hammer, Warden, Rush City Correctional Facility and Attorney General of the State of Minnesota
Peters v. Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City)
as 0:2015cv04083
Plaintiff:
Jameel Antonio Peters
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections (Rush City), Thomas Roy , The Deputy Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. USA
as 4:2015cv03126
Petitioner:
Traves Rush
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
