Cases 41 - 50 of 666
Wayne v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Montez R Wayne
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ture v. Freeman et al
as 0:2023cv01011
Plaintiff:
Joseph Donald Ture, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Freeman, Kathleen Heaney, Peter Orput and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Stange, et al
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Stanley Johnson
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Unknown Armstrong, Major Unknown Mayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Collins v. Travis Anderson, et al
as 23-1699
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aaron J. Collins
Defendant / Appellee:
Travis Anderson, Former Polk County Sheriff, Hunter Wissink, Former Polk County Sheriff and Bill McCarthy
Defendant:
Kynsie Anderson, Former Polk County Sheriff and Polk County Jail
Walther v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Shawn M. Walther
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Proudie v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00033
Petitioner:
Dyanthany Proudie
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oreyana v. Stange et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Plaintiff:
Melkis Oreyana
Defendant:
Bill Stange and Aaron R. Raines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Stange
as 1:2023cv00068
Petitioner:
Devin Mosley
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roper v. Missouri, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Roper
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Michael E. Gans, Daniel F. Kellogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Chatman
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Ann Precythe, Bill Stange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
