Cases 41 - 50 of 22,168
McCullough v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Alvin McCullough
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirkpatrick v. Does
as 4:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Skyler Kirkpatrick
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kwasi McKinney
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. Hanuska et al
as 2:2024cv02062
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dakota Justice
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Emily Hanuska, Correctional Officer Elizabeth Woolsey, Lieutenant Samantha Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Shatina Ann Logan
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, Chief Deputy Joey Davis, APRN Joan McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Roberts
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Darius Santwann Dixon
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00412
Petitioner:
Dominic R Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Winnett v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Donald F Winnett
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Westlake v. Eureka Springs Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv03024
Plaintiff:
Emerson Tron Westlake
Defendant:
Eureka Springs Police Department, Tim Holm and Does Officers, Eureka Springs Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
