Cases 41 - 50 of 22,222
Owens v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Marcus Oneil Laquient Owens and Mark
Defendant:
Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04056
Plaintiff:
Harold Steve Hale and Scooter Hale
Defendant:
Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goshade v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Goshade
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. WellPath Medical Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
WellPath Medical Corporation, Kent, Rory Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Karlos Marquett Booker
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Mendoza v. Ross et al
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Santos Gerardo Mendoza and Santos Gerardo Mendoza Castellon
Defendant:
Lieutenant Ross, Jailer McMores, Sergeant Heartman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Karas Correctional Health (KCH) et al
as 5:2024cv05117
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Karas Correctional Health (KCH), Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Paramedic Dustin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
Davis, Michael Hale, Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ribardi v. Does
as 2:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jared Ribardi
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Larry Daryl Collins
Defendant:
Joe Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
