Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Dennis Cooney v. Brockman, et al
as 24-1028
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cooney
Defendant:
Brockman, Sgt., Faulkner County Detention Center, Huffman, Captain, Faulkner County Detention Center, Scott, Lt., Faulkner County Detention Center and others
Eric Lee v. Brockman, et al
as 23-2371
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eric Lee
Defendant / Appellee:
Brockman, Sgt., Faulkner County Detention Center, Huffman, Captain, Faulkner County Detention Center, Scott, Lt., Faulkner County Detention Center and others
Mahar v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mahar
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Jason H Campbell
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Troy Arnold
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ben v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Darwin Ben
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Pearson, III
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brumley v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Michael Brumley
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Mario Rodgers and Mario R Rodgers
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
