Cases 1 - 10 of 1,076
Robinson v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Calvin Robinson, Kevin Robinson and Bilal Ali Salam
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry v. Payne
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jarell Terry
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Woods et al
as 4:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
Norris B Howard, Sr
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Jimmy Hudson, Joseph Gorman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rettstatt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Rettstatt
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Micheal Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Damion Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey, Jr
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, D Earl, James Dycus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Johnson, K Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Lee E Stokes, Jr and Chango Kundalini
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Keith
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Evans
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
