Cases 1 - 10 of 364
Shelby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jimmy DeWayne Shelby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, State of Missouri, Phyllis M. Byland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Walton v. Keen
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Walton
Defendant:
Daniel Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Daniel Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. Boone County Sheriffs Dept et al
as 2:2024cv04072
Plaintiff:
Ronald Elwood Brown
Defendant:
Boone County Sheriffs Dept, Dewayne Carey, Danielle Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurtain v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Eric McCurtain
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Maria Nichols, Dr Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wry v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wry
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections and Monica Arcc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. Anderson
as 4:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Respondent:
Donna Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
