Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Seals-Supalus v. Government
as 4:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
King Solomon Seals-Supalus
Defendant:
Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Morriss
as 5:2024cv06076
Respondent:
Kelly Morriss
Petitioner:
Christopher M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. King et al
as 6:2023cv03395
Plaintiff:
Anthony Porter
Defendant:
M King, VerPloeg, M Tizen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Holmes
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Missouri, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Esparza et al
as 6:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Antwoine R King
Defendant:
Jeffrey Esparza, Kathryn Merwald, Darryl Hairston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Hunt et al
as 6:2023cv03350
Plaintiff:
Antwoine R King
Defendant:
Jamie K Hunt, Thomas Komoroski, Matthew Brummett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Ryder et al
as 2:2022cv04190
Plaintiff:
Christopher King
Defendant:
Phillip Ryder, Chad Hall, Jacob Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Buchanan County Police Department et al
as 5:2022cv06097
Plaintiff:
Valdez McDonald
Defendant:
Buchanan County Police Department, Patrick Robb, Broadus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
