Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00127
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Lisa Nance and others
Plaintiff:
Philip Stacy
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Lisa Nance and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Hamby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koehn v. Baldwin et al
as 4:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Zachary Koehn
Defendant:
Randy Gibb, Trip, Brad Hoenig and others
Interested Party:
William A. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steve Bader v. Rush, et al
as 15-2512
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Steve Scott Bader
Defendant - Appellee:
Rush, Field Sergeant, North Central Unit, Cooper, Field Lieutenant, North Central Unit, Peters, Corporal, North Central Unit and others
Willie Blackmon v. George Lombardi, et al
as 13-1503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Willie Blackmon
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Scott Lawrence, Warden, Sandra Jimmerson, Assistant Warden and others
Timothy Schofield v. Roy Hopkin
as 12-2289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Schofield
Defendant - Appellee:
Roy Hopkins, Missouri Department of Corrections, General Manager (MUE Laundry), Moberly Correctional Center, Official and Individual Capacity
Ramon McGraw v. Berry Sims, et al
as 11-2859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Berry Sims, Pulaski County Circuit Judge, Kent Krouse, Public Defender, Gary Arnold, Saline County Circuit Judge and others
Ramon McGraw v. AR Dept. of Correction, et al
as 11-1084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ramon Hosea McGraw
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, United States District Court, Saline County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
