Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Wudnuer v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 8:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Wubill Wudnuer and Kan Mar
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections, Hawshank, CO's and Seargants Involved and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00185
Defendant:
Lt. Sanduski, Michael Myers, Douglas County Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Thompson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution et al
as 6:2024cv06040
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus and IamsuiTitus
Defendant:
Gucci Store Franchise and Distribution, Givendy Distribution, Back to the Future (the Movie) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Douglas County Jail et al
as 8:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Wood
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail, Michael Myers, Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2022cv00277
Petitioner:
Foster Watkins
Defendant:
State of Nebraska and Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tyler v. Myers et al
as 4:2022cv03138
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Defendant:
Michael Myers and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez Lopez v. Myers
as 8:2022cv00114
Petitioner:
Din G. Chavez Lopez
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. City of Omaha Police-Dept. et al
as 8:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Omaha Police-Dept. and Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tucker v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00475
Petitioner:
Kevin Tucker
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood v. Myers
as 8:2021cv00470
Petitioner:
Joseph Wood, Jr.
Respondent:
Michael Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.