Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kyle Dalen v. Jodi Harpstead
as 24-1498
Plaintiff: Kyle Jerome Dalen, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant: Jodi Harpstead, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, in her individual and official capacities
Kenneth Daywitt, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 24-1138
Plaintiff: Kenneth Daywitt, David James Jannetta, Steven Merrill Hogy and others
Defendant: Jodi Harpstead, DHS Commissioner; in their individual and official capacities, Marshall Smith, in their individual and official capacities, Nancy Johnston, in their individual and official capacities and others
Jeremy Mount v. J. Fikes, et al
as 24-1047
Plaintiff: Jeremy David Mount, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant: Warden J. Fikes, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of FCI Sandstone of PINE County, D. Drilling, individually and in his official capacities as correctional officer for the mail room of FCI-Sandstone PINE county and J. Best, individually and in his official capacities as Correctional Officer of FCI-Sandstone Mail Room of PINE County
James Rud, et al v. Nancy Johnston, et al
as 23-1577
Plaintiff / Appellee: James John Rud, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and Brian K. Hausfeld, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: Nancy Johnston, Executive Director, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, in official capacity and Jodi Harpstead, Department of Human Services Commissioner, in official capacity
musa al-gamar al mu'min v. Bosch et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2021cv02464
Plaintiff: D. Thomas, Musa Al-Gamar Al-Mu'Min For his estate, himself and others similarly situated doing business as Pharaoh El-Forever Left-I; Amen El, Pharaoh El-Forever Left-i; Amen El doing business as Pharaoh El-Forever Left-I; Amen El also known as musa al-gamar al mu'min and others
Defendant: United States of America, State of Minnesota, Vatican Church and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Karsjens, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1459
Plaintiff / Appellant: Kevin Scott Karsjens, and all others similarly situated, Kevin John DeVillion, and all others similarly situated, Peter Gerard Lonergan, and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Jodi Harpstead, Kevin Moser, in their individual and official capacities, Peter Puffer and others
Black Elk et al v. Roy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv03255
Plaintiff: Shannon D. Hollie, Rodney Thundercloud, Jamie Allen Andrews and others
Defendant: Nancy Johnston, Thomas Roy, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff: Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant: Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Scott Karsjens, et al v. Lucinda Jesson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3485
Plaintiff - Appellee: Kevin Scott Karsjens, David Leroy Gamble, Kevin John DeVillion and others
Defendant - Appellant: Lucinda Jesson, Kevin Moser, Peter Puffer and others
Jerome Bargo, et al v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-1984
Plaintiff - Appellant: Jerome Allen Bargo, and all other similarly situated inmates and Robert Harold Munnerlyn, and all other similarly situated inmates
Plaintiff: Marion Gene Westerman, and all other similarly situated inmates
Defendant - Appellee: Wendy Kelly, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Randall Watson, Warden, Varner Unit, Jeremy Andrews, Deputy Warden, Varner Unit and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?