Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Nicholas Ely v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2036
Petitioner:
Nicholas Ely
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys, the Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Todd Wasmer, Warden Tecumseh Correctional Institution
Marqus Patton v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-2026
Plaintiff:
Marqus Patton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of the Reception and Treatment Center, Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Rob Jeffreys, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
O'Toole v. Danaher et al
as 4:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Ryan James O'Toole
Defendant:
Dan Danaher, Teena Lenger, Michele Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Tillman Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America and Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Costello v. Nebraska Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Costello
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Corrections, Erica Adeyemi, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk Robinson v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-1392
Petitioner:
Kirk D. Robinson
Respondent:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of RTC and Rob Jeffreys, Director of Corrections, Nebraska
Franke v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Pernell M. Franke
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clifton v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Casey B. Clifton
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trail v. Jeffreys
as 4:2024cv03032
Petitioner:
Aubrey C. Trail
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
