Cases 1 - 10 of 383
Terry v. District Court of Benton County, Arkansas
as 5:2024cv05179
Respondent:
District Court of Benton County, Arkansas
Petitioner:
Jonathan J. Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wallace v. Nelson et al
as 4:2024cv00685
Defendant:
S Nelson, D Craig, S Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamont Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Defendant:
Micke Golbert, Shannon Crocket, Jesse Love and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00555
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Shipman, Sarah Huckabee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Defendant:
Kelly Patterson, Jesse Love, Micke Golbert and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Payne
as 2:2024cv00119
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Plaintiff:
Jarell Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. Jefferson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2024cv00510
Defendant:
Thompkins, Hudson, Judy Browley and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00497
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Banister et al
as 4:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
James Wright
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Authement v. Carl et al
as 6:2024cv06068
Defendant:
Doe A-Shift Workers, Sgt. James Smith, Warden Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Peter Authement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
