Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Perez v. El Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv02727
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
El Mazatlan Mexican Restaurant, Inc. and Karina Felix
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Classic Cabinetry by Knapp, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv02558
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Classic Cabinetry by Knapp, Inc., Michael Knapp and Kory Knapp
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Secretary of Labor v. Milan, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv03200
Defendant:
Milan, Inc. and Amrut B Patel
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Perez v. S & K Express LLC
as 4:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
Juan Perez
Defendant:
S & K Express LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Magic Touch Cleaning, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Magic Touch Cleaning, Inc. and Gary Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Hoskins Enterprises, LLC et al
as 0:2015cv01233
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Hoskins Enterprises, LLC, JHM, LLC and John Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Hanvik et al
as 0:2015cv00577
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Jean Hanvik, SGH Communications, Inc. and SGH Communications, Inc. Simple Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. BM Hotels, Inc., et al
as 4:2015cv03013
Defendant:
BM Hotels, Inc., Boney Corp., JM Hotels, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Cable Equipment Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2015cv00416
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Cable Equipment Services, Inc. and Marilyn Appeldorn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Thomas E. Perez, et al v. Contingent Care, LLC, et al
as 15-1074
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Thomas E. Perez, Secretary of Labor and United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellant:
Contingent Care, LLC, Endless Possibilities, LLC and Wolfgang J. Shields
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
