Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 1.12 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01360
Defendant: 1.06 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Michael Stanley Mintert as Trustee of the Michael Stanley Mintert Trust Dated January 10, 2003, 1.12 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 2.27 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri et al
as 4:2018cv01342
Defendant: 5.72 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 2.27 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.51 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri and others
Plaintiff: Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. 3.31 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv01327
Defendant: 2.38 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, Portage Des Sioux, City of, GULF CENTRAL PIPELINE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: SPIRE STL PIPELINE LLC
Consolidated Defendant: 3.04 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Charles County, State of Missouri, 0.28 acres of land, more or less, situated in St. Louis County, State of Missouri, Capital Commerce Mortgage Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Fifth Third Bank v. Lady Sara, Ltd. et al
as 0:2018mc00058
Plaintiff: Fifth Third Bank
Defendant: Steven M Mariano, Douglas Von Allmen, Lady Sara, Ltd. and others
REVERE v. SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC et al
as 4:2018cv01178
Defendant: ASCENSION HEALTH LONG-TERM DISABILITY PLAN (AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF JANUARY 1, 2006) and Sedgwick Claims Management Services Inc.
Plaintiff: MAMIE REVERE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
January v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv03826
Plaintiff: Carolyn January
Defendant: 3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buchek et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01850
Plaintiff: Curtis Buchek , Regina Abercrombie , Michelle Anderson and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones et al v. Bayer Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv01192
Defendant: Bayer Corporation , Bayer Healthcare LLC , Bayer Essure Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Traci Jones , Dinora Vargas , Cherita Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States v. Shannon William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1200
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant - Appellant: Shannon E. Williams
United States v. Violet Goodwin
as 12-2405
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant: Shannon E. Williams
Interested Party - Appellant: Violet Goodwin

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?