Cases 11 - 20 of 358
Eva Alvizures-Ramirez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1259
Petitioner:
Eva Jazmin Alvizures-Ramirez and Jenny Alvizures-Ramirez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Aura Ramirez-Lopez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1135
Petitioner:
Aura Ramirez-Lopez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Marvin Ixtabalan Ramirez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1106
Petitioner:
Marvin Ixtabalan Ramirez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Matthew Ramirez v. Chris Tripp, et al
as 24-1021
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wayne Ramirez
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Warden, Brad Hoenig, Treatment Director, John Martinez, Security Director ISP and others
Timothy v. Falls City PD et al
as 8:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Matthew Timothy
Defendant:
Falls City PD, Juan Ramirez and Michael L. Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayon et al v. Springstead et al
as 4:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
Judith Ayon and Edwin Ramirez-Cordero
Defendant:
Robert Springstead, Ozark Ready-Mix Company, Inc. and TSV Contracting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Ramirez v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00457
Petitioner:
Andrew Xavier Ramirez
Respondent:
State of Iowa and Kristofer Karberg
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enma Camo-Ramirez, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-3320
Petitioner:
Enma Marili Camo-Ramirez and E.G.L.C.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
