Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Benton v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00287
Plaintiff:
Rico Benton
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , William Straughn , Maurice Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blakely v. Hobbs
as 5:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Rico M Blakely
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey v. Felts et al
as 4:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Rico Sentell Harvey
Defendant:
John Felts, Tommy McBroom and Ashley Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2013cv01037
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rico James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cohn v. Carlton et al
as 5:2012cv05218
Plaintiff:
Rico Cohn
Defendant:
Scott Carlton and Fayetteville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marshalltown Company v. Emmert Second Limited Partnership et al
as 5:2011cv05099
Plaintiff:
Marshalltown Company
Defendant:
Emmert Second Limited Partnership, I.A.M. of Puerto Rico, Inc. and Dura-Stilt Sales Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Buzan v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 4:2010cv01023
Plaintiff:
Helen Buzan
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Puerto Rico Inc, Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al v. Access Closure, Inc.
as 4:2008cv04101
Plaintiff:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and St. Jude Medical Puerto Rico LLC
Defendant:
Access Closure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hale et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00167
Plaintiff:
James Hale and Luther Martin
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic International Technology Inc and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hodges et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Larry Hodges, Bertha Franklin and Jacqueline Scaife
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc, Medtronic International Technology Inc and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
