Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Robert Woodward v. James Gibson, et al
as 19-2283
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC and James Gibson, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Robert Woodward v. Dexter Payne
as 19-2286
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Robert Woodward v. James Gibson, et al
as 19-2289
Defendant / Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC and James Gibson, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Robert Woodward v. James Gibson, et al
as 19-2284
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC, James Gibson, Warden, Varner Unit, ADC and Wendy Kelley, Director, ADC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Robert Woodward v. Jay Buchman, et al
as 19-2279
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Jay Buchman, Surgeon, Little Rock Surgery Center
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Robert Woodward v. Bivens
as 19-2281
Defendant / Appellee:
Bivens, Lieutenant, Varner Unit, ADC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Robert Woodward v. James Gibson, et al
as 19-2276
Defendant / Appellee:
Christopher, Captain, Varner Unit, ADC, Madden, Sergeant, Bivens, Lieutenant, Varner Unit, ADC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Woodward
Woodward v. Ross et al
as 5:2019cv00058
Plaintiff:
Robert E Woodward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Thomas Deen and Quincey Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert E Woodward
Defendant:
James Gibson and Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodward v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00048
Plaintiff:
Robert E Woodward
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Shipman, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
