Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Schmitt et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 0:2013cv03291
Plaintiff:
Raymond Schmitt, Jr. and Patricia Schmitt
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jefson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv03292
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jefson and Mark Jefson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Relles et al v. Howmedica Ostenoics Corp.
as 0:2013cv02503
Plaintiff:
James Relles and Marilyn Relles
Defendant:
Howmedica Ostenoics Corp. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2013cv01909
Plaintiff:
Sandra Wilkins
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Petersen et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics
as 0:2013cv01609
Plaintiff:
Nels Petersen and Elaine Petersen
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Peterson et al v. Hamilton Mortgage Company et al
as 8:2013cv00115
Defendant:
Edward Brink, Does 1 through 20, GMAC Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Deborah K. Peterson and Jay S. Peterson
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Miller Act
Lockhart v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Lockhart
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceuticals and DOES 1 to 20, inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Fagin v. Atlee et al
as 4:2010cv01929
Plaintiff:
Glen Fagin
Defendant:
Frank V. Atlee, III, John W. Bachmann, David Chicoine and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Kurland v. Atlee et al
as 4:2010cv01605
Plaintiff:
Paul Kurland
Defendant:
Frank V. Atlee, III, John W. Bachmann, David L. Chicone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
