Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Armstrong v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Lynn Armstrong
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Mitchell et al v. Northern States Transportation, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jerry Mitchell and Cheryl Mitchell
Defendant:
Northern States Transportation, Inc., Trail King Industries, Inc. , Carlisle Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Fayram
as 4:2010cv00155
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Armstrong
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Armstrong v. Fayram
as 1:2010cv00055
Petitioner:
Charles Henry Armstrong
Respondent:
John Fayram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Wieneke et al
as 3:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Sharon Armstrong
Defendant:
Ronald E. Wieneke and Emerson Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maxwell v. Linn County Correctional Center et al
as 1:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Curtis James Maxwell
Defendant:
Linn County Correctional Center, Unknown Booking Officer, Unknown Officer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong v. Dietcer et al
as 1:2008cv00138
Plaintiff:
Danny Armstrong
Defendant:
Julie Dietcer, Iowa Prison Industries (I.P.I.) and Iowa Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Armstrong v. Baldwin
as 4:2008cv00424
Plaintiff:
Tony Dion James Beac Armstrong
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Terry Mapes, Mike Long and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Prosser et al
as 5:2008cv04005
Plaintiff:
Paul George Peterson
Defendant:
Mark Prosser, Todd Erskine, Ray Eickholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
