Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Arcaro v. City of Anoka et al
as 0:2013cv02772
Plaintiff:
Ashley Arcaro
Defendant:
City of Anoka , City of Brooklyn Park , City of Clarkfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Loeffler v. Anoka, City of et al
as 0:2013cv02060
Plaintiff:
Jennie Marie Loeffler
Defendant:
Anoka, City of , Burnsville, City of , Dakota County and others
Carlson v. City of Duluth, Minnesota
as 0:2013cv01831
Plaintiff:
James Robert Carlson
Defendant:
City of Duluth, Minnesota
Steve Jankowski, et al v. Jim Nilsson
as 12-3449
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Steve Jankowski and Peter Scott
Defendant:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellant:
Jim Nilsson, individually and in his official capacity as a Police Officer for the City of Duluth
Miles LaCross v. City of Duluth, et al
as 12-2395
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Miles LaCross
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Duluth, Officer Anton Marc, Lt. Dan Chicos and others
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
as 11-3883
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellant:
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
City of Duluth v. Fond Du Lac Band of Chippewa
as 11-3884
Plaintiff - Appellant:
City of Duluth
Defendant - Appellee:
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa
L.P.O.E., Inc. v. City of Duluth, Minnesota, The
as 0:2010cv04133
Plaintiff:
L.P.O.E., Inc.
Defendant:
City of Duluth, Minnesota, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacross v. Duluth, City of et al
as 0:2010cv03922
Plaintiff:
Miles Lacross
Defendant:
Duluth, City of, Anton Marc, Fogerty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. City of Duluth, The et al
as 0:2009cv01590
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America and Minnesota, The State of
Defendant:
City of Duluth, The and Western Lake Superior Sanitary District
Cause Of Action: Federal Water Pollution Control Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
