Cases 41 - 50 of 332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Griffin v. Warden et al
as 8:2022cv00344
Petitioner:
Arthur T. James Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, City of Omaha, Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Griffin v. City of Omaha Police Dept. Officers
as 8:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Arthur T. James Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Omaha Police Dept. Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00216
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Anson v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00174
Plaintiff:
Patrick Anson and Patrick Anson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Griffin v. Omaha Police Dept
as 8:2022cv00166
Petitioner:
Arthur T. Griffin, Jr.
Respondent:
Omaha Police Dept
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Deprtment of Heaith and Human Services et al
as 4:2022cv03070
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Deprtment of Heaith and Human Services and Jessica Dryer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. USA
as 8:2022cv00162
Petitioner:
Curtis Holmes, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 8:2022cv00145
Petitioner:
Sherman Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dixon v. Two Unknown Correctional Officer
as 8:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eugene Dixon, Jr.
Defendant:
Two Unknown Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
