Cases 41 - 50 of 1,118
Lambert v. Payne
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lambert
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Payne v. Langley et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Payne, III
Defendant:
Tammy Langley and Turn Key Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Jacinto Martinez
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Gray et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Samuel Jay Love
Defendant:
Michelle Gray, S Ricketts and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childers v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Childers
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 6:2024cv06033
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koontz v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Morris B Koontz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Moses Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar v. Dycus et al
as 4:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Donna Dycus, Jared Byers, Herbert Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Payne
as 6:2024cv06031
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Respondent:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
