Cases 41 - 50 of 147
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Gonzalez-Bula et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02041
Plaintiff:
Roman Omas, Kyron McLean, David Smith and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Powers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv01972
Plaintiff:
Wilson Ospina, David Haughton, Jaood Wallace and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl
Santos v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00324
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Adrian Santos
Anthony Floyd v. United States, et al
as 19-1274
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony James Floyd
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos
Anthony Floyd v. United States, et al
as 19-1253
Petitioner / Appellant:
Anthony James Floyd
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Robert De Los Santos, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service
Nyakundi v. Silverness et al
as 0:2019cv00134
Defendant:
Erik Honkanen, Jane Does, Jennifer Silverness and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Nyakundi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria M. Quinilla Santos, et al v. William P. Barr
as 19-1120
Petitioner:
Maria Margarita Quinilla Santos and Brian Anderson Gomez-Quinilla
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General of United States and William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018mc00612
Respondent:
United States of America, Robert De Los Santos and Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Anthony James Floyd
Floyd v. United States of America et al
as 4:2018mc09018
Respondent:
United States of America, Robert De Los Santos and Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner:
Anthony James Floyd
Interested Party:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
