Cases 41 - 50 of 266
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01225
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01238
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Abdullah v. Lepinski et al
as 0:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Zakee Abdullah
Defendant:
Justin Young, Adam Lepinski and City of Minneapolis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamada Hussein v. M Health Fairview, et al
as 22-3527
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
M Health Fairview, Fridley Police Department, Rochester Minnesota Police Department and others
Gamada Hussein v. Walmart Inc., et al
as 22-3507
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gamada Ahmed Hussein
Defendant / Appellee:
Walmart, Inc., U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, U.S. Bank, Neosho Branch and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
