Cases 41 - 50 of 4,529
Eulalia Tino-De La Cruz, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1642
Petitioner:
Eulalia Lourdes Tino-De La Cruz and P.M.Z.T.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Stephen Plunkett v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1639
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Collette Peters, John P. Yates, Warden and others
OH Bureau of Workers' Comp., et al v. SEC
as 24-1631
Petitioner:
Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Commonwealth of Kentucky, ex rel. Attorney General Russell Coleman and State of Tennessee, ex rel. Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti
Respondent:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Yesica Viana-De Aleman v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1595
Petitioner:
Yesica Liseth Viana-De Aleman
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Ingrid Domingo-Aguilar v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1599
Petitioner:
Ingrid Domingo-Aguilar
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Earl Dowty v. Brent Fluke, et al
as 24-1606
Petitioner:
Earl D. Dowty
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Jason Jensen v. Citibank, N.A., et al
as 24-1596
Plaintiff:
Jason Adam Jensen
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A., a Corporation, Citigroup Inc., A Delaware Corporation, JH Met Subsidiary B. Liquidating Trust, A Legal Trust Type Corporation and others
Emmanuel De Jesus-Martinez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1579
Petitioner:
Emmanuel De Jesus-Martinez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Karla Maradiaga-Blandin v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1587
Petitioner:
Karla Yoleny Maradiaga-Blandin
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Henderson v. Jeffreys
as 8:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Tillman Henderson
Respondent:
United States of America and Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
