Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Landstar Global Logistics v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
Landstar Global Logistics
Defendant:
Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc. and Cosolidated Group of Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maurer et al v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Christoper Maurer and Belinda Maurer
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc. and Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lyons et al v. Cosco Inc et al
as 3:2009cv00168
Plaintiff:
Sadie Lyons, Sadie Lyons, Jane Lyons and others
Defendant:
Cosco Inc and Dorel Juvenile Group inc
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
United States v. I. L.
as 09-3403
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
I. L., Juvenile Offender
Elizabeth McCray v. Francis Howell School District, et al
as 09-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elizabeth McCray
Plaintiff:
B. J. G.
Defendant - Appellee:
Francis Howell School District and Juvenile Justice Center
Defendant:
St. Charles County Sheriff
United States v. A.E.B.
as 09-1903
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
A.E.B., Juvenile
McCray et al v. Francis Howell School District
as 4:2008cv01178
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McCray and B.S.G.
Defendant:
Francis Howell School District, St. Charles County Sheriff and Juvenile Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. A.E.B.
as 08-1844
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
A.E.B., Juvenile
United States v. P.A.V. (Juvenile Male)
as 08-1776
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
P.A.V. (Juvenile Male)
Richardson v. Division of Family Services et al
as 6:2008cv03068
Plaintiff:
Randal Lamar Richardson
Defendant:
Division of Family Services, Debbie Straight, Leah White and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
