Cases 51 - 60 of 407
Stafford v. Douglas County Correctional Center
as 8:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
William J. Stafford
Defendant:
Douglas County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffries v. C/O Porshe et al
as 8:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Sean Jeffries
Defendant:
C/O Porshe, C/O Yang, Sgt Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Gee v. Douglas Cty, Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00035
Petitioner:
Brian D. Gee
Respondent:
Douglas Cty, Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McClure v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Douglas McClure
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. UNMC et al
as 8:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Brent Edward Johnson
Defendant:
UNMC, Bellevue Police Dept., Bellevue Fire Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bedford v. McNully et al
as 8:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Lee A. Bedford, Jr.
Defendant:
McNully, Stigler, Lori Austell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Douglas Co. Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Toby Rex Thompson
Defendant:
Douglas Co. Corrections, Amber Dyball, Rebecca Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jensen v. Rath et al
as 8:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Jay D. Jensen and Jay Douglas Jensen
Defendant:
Patti Rath
Garnishee:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Nielsen v. Douglas Cty Prosecutor
as 8:2022cv00024
Petitioner:
Dustin L. Nielsen
Respondent:
Douglas Cty Prosecutor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
