Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Christian v. Willis
as 4:2014cv04020
Petitioner:
John R. Christian
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv02464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Siems et al v. Bumbo International Trust et al
as 4:2013cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jessica Siems , Siems Jessie and J.S.
Defendant:
Bumbo International Trust and Target Corporation
Interested_party:
Underwriters at Lloyds and Chaucer Syndicates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whitbeck v. Willis
as 4:2013cv04073
Petitioner:
Raymond C. Whitbeck, Sr.
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
United States v. Edward J.S. Picardi
as 13-2041
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Edward J.S. Picardi, MD
Cockett v. Willis
as 4:2013cv04049
Petitioner:
Osborne Cockett
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Picardi v. United States of America
as 5:2013cv05035
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Edward J.S. Picardi
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
Grealish v. Willis
as 4:2013cv04020
Petitioner:
John Peter Grealish
Respondent:
J.S. Willis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reid, et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, et al
as 4:2013cv00248
Plaintiff:
J. L. B. , T. H.I.L. H. , S. A.L. S. and others
Defendant:
Doe Run Resources Corporation , Marvin K. Kaiser , Albert Bruce Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Q. et al v. THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION et al
as 4:2012cv01345
Plaintiff:
A. C. Q. , A. Y. C.B. , A. E. C.B. and others
Defendant:
THE DOE RUN RESOURCES CORPORATION , D.R. Acquisition Corp. , Marvin K. Kaiser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
