Cases 51 - 60 of 165
Taylor v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2017cv01044
Plaintiff:
Pamela Taylor
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Cervantes v. Mississippi County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Michael Cervantes
Defendant:
Mississippi County Detention Center, Arkansas, State of, Luther Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledbetter v. Mississippi County Detention Center et al
as 3:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ledbetter
Defendant:
Mississippi County Detention Center, Arkansas, State of, Luther Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charleston v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
Pamela Charleston
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stacy v. Whittle et al
as 5:2017cv05040
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Stacy
Defendant:
Russell Whittle, Pamela Ann Stacy-Whittle, Amber Whittle Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gentry et al v. Ammons et al
as 4:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Allen Gentry and Pamela Gentry
Defendant:
John Ammons, Paschall Truck Lines Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stacy v. Whittle et al
as 4:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Stacy
Defendant:
Russell Whittle, Pamela Ann Stacy-Whittle, Amber Whittle Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Cook et al
as 5:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Leki Woods
Defendant:
Pamela F Cook, J Byers, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv05352
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hill
Defendant:
TEVA Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and TEVA Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marshall v. Bank of America NA et al
as 4:2016cv00686
Plaintiff:
Pamela K Marshall
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Seterus Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
