Cases 51 - 60 of 78
Hercules-Cornejo v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv05195
Plaintiff:
Oscar Hercules-Cornejo
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc. and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Almanza v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
as 5:2011cv05179
Plaintiff:
Evangalina Cruz Almanza
Defendant:
Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Adams v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03059
Plaintiff:
Dale B Adams
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc., Leland E Tollett, Albert C Zapanta and others
Movant:
United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv05163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
National American Insurance Company v. Bennett et al
as 5:2010cv05246
Plaintiff:
National American Insurance Company
Defendant:
Corinne Bennett and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv04001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv05277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nelson v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 5:2009cv05195
Plaintiff:
J.D. Nelson
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc. and UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
