Cases 71 - 80 of 169
Mattox v. Warden Young et al
as 5:2016cv05025
Petitioner:
Mathew Warren Mattox
Respondent:
Young and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Christopher Hatchett v. Darin Young, et al
as 16-1939
Petitioner - Appellant:
Christopher Hatchett
Respondent - Appellee:
Darin Young and Marty Jackley, Attorney General, State of South Dakota
Clayton Creek v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 16-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Clayton Sheldon Creek
Defendant - Appellee:
Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota, in his individual and official capacity, Dennis Kaemingk, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, Robert Dooley, Chief Warden, South Dakota D.O.C., in his individual and official capacity and others
Claymore v. South Dakota et al
as 4:2016cv04043
Petitioner:
Jason Allen Claymore
Respondent:
South Dakota, Joe Flynn, Cutler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kim Wade Dillon v. Dennis Daugaard, et al
as 16-1657
Petitioner - Appellant:
Kim Wade Dillon
Respondent - Appellee:
Dennis Daugaard, Governor of South Dakota, Dennis Kaemingk, Secretary of Corrections, Robert Dooley, Chief Warden of SDDOC and others
Litschewski v. Dooley et al
as 1:2016cv01015
Petitioner:
Richard Virgil Litschewski
Respondent:
Robert Dooley and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DuMarce v. Weber et al
as 4:2016cv04034
Petitioner:
Marlon Troy DuMarce
Respondent:
Douglas Weber and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salamo v. Young et al
as 4:2016cv04029
Petitioner:
Jesus Salamo
Respondent:
Darin Young and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Jackley et al
as 5:2016cv05015
Plaintiff:
Clayton Walker
Defendant:
Angela Jackley, Susan Gannon, Doneen Hollensworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Litschewski v. Dooley et al
as 1:2016cv01009
Petitioner:
Richard Litschewski
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Dennis Kaemingk and Marty Jackley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
