Cases 81 - 90 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv01008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Robben v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division et al
as 4:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Linda Robben
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division, Missouri Alliance Permanency Program, Frankie Crouppen Thiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company v. Walton Construction Company, LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00966
Plaintiff:
Amerisure Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Walton Construction Company LLC and The Children's Mercy Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Healing the Children, Inc. v. World Pediatric Project
as 4:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Healing the Children, Inc.
Defendant:
World Pediatric Project
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Aldridge et al v. Boys and Girls Town of Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv02199
Plaintiff:
George F. Aldridge and KA
Defendant:
Boys and Girls Town of Missouri, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Foster v. Eckert et al
as 4:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Linda Dianne Foster
Defendant:
W.J. Eckert, David L. Baylard, Peyton Clark Foster and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
