Cases 81 - 90 of 155
Horton v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00435
Plaintiff:
Charles Horton
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Counts v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00431
Plaintiff:
Timothy D Counts
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
Quincy Harris
Defendant:
Clark, Hill, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Robertson v. Eric Higgins, et al
as 22-1834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Higgins, Sheriff, Pulaski County and Doe, "Leo", Commissary
Epperson v. Mathis et al
as 4:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Henry Epperson
Defendant:
R Mathis, C Allen and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Robertson v. Cobb, et al
as 22-1732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Cobb, Sergeant, Belt, Deputy, Phillip, Deputy and others
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Rose, Calvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Rose, Calvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serverance v. Higgins
as 4:2022cv00246
Plaintiff:
Scott Andrew Serverance and Scott Andrew Severance
Defendant:
Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Michael Robertson v. Turn Key Medical, et al
as 22-1418
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Otis Robertson
Defendant / Appellee:
Turn Key Medical, Nurses, Doctors, Glesson, Nurse, Pulaski County Detention Facility, Does, "Doctor Robert"; "Nurse Katy"; Pulaski County Detention Facility and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
