Cases 81 - 90 of 614
Ana Garcia-Perez v. Merrick B. Garland
as 21-3148
Petitioner:
Ana Carolina Garcia-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland
Walsh v. Perez, et al
as 4:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Secretary of Labor Martin J. Walsh
Defendant:
Jorge A. Perez, HMC/CAH Consolidated, Inc., HMC/CAH Consolidated, Inc. Life and AD&D Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Abbott et al v. Walmart Inc
as 3:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Abbott, Meagan Albert, Sophia Alfaro and others
Defendant:
Walmart Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Perez v. United States
as 21-2785
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher K. Perez
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Marco Corchado-Perez v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 21-2605
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Corchado-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Ivicsics et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00675
Plaintiff:
EVELYN JEANNETTE BARGER, Carmela Lopez, Diane Williams and others
Defendant:
. DOE MANUFACTURERS 1-100, C. R. BARD, INC., SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mercy Perez Aviles, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 21-2237
Petitioner:
Mercy A. Perez Aviles, M.E.H.P. and V.M.P.P.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Johnson v. O&F Logistics LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00469
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Defendant:
Hector Perez Padron and O&F Logistics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Christopher Perez
as 21-2130
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Mateo Perez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Perez v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00557
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Cornelieo Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
