Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plocek-Swanson v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv00030
Defendant:
Dayton Hudson Corp and Target Corporation
Plaintiff:
Tina Plocek-Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dayton Superior Corporation v. CMT Highway LLC
as 1:2019cv00038
Defendant:
CMT Highway LLC
Plaintiff:
Dayton Superior Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sebasta v. State of Iowa
as 4:2018cv00373
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Plaintiff:
Dayton Sebasta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Provost v. Christopher
as 4:2018cv00282
Plaintiff:
Dayton Provost
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Defendant:
Jack Christopher, Faculty, Staff Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heins v. Jarvey et al
as 4:2018cv00118
Plaintiff:
Dayton Matthew Heins
Defendant:
John A Jarvey, Casey Ritchie, James E Gritzner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heins v. Jarvey et al
as 4:2018cv00063
Petitioner:
Dayton Matthew Heins
Respondent:
John A Jarvey, Casey Ritchie, Federal Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickering v. Thompson et al
as 3:2017cv03074
Plaintiff:
Chad Pickering
Defendant:
Bret Thompson, Jon Morris, Bryan Dayton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hout v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Heins v. Young et al
as 4:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Dayton Matthew Heins
Defendant:
Joseph Young, John Burns, John Courter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Biden et al
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Arlen Specter, Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
