Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. Eason et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Norris
Defendant:
Jerome L Eason, Knight, Miesha Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Stroud et al
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Gary W Gardner
Defendant:
Stroud, Deborah Goodwin, Linda Sanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Young et al
as 4:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Tommie E Mason
Defendant:
Lewis H Young, Deborah Goodwin, Marshall Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jake Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Kenny Bolden, RD Williamson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Englebert v. Rucker et al
as 2:2023cv02010
Plaintiff:
Richard Lamar Englebert, JR.
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe Medical Staff, Joshua LNU, Freddy Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodwin v. Richardson et al
as 4:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Goodwin
Defendant:
Colin Richardson and Williams Food Work and Distribution LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Frazier v. Goodwin
as 2:2022cv02118
Plaintiff:
Daniel Frazier
Defendant:
Nurse Ryan Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badger v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Craytonia Badger
Defendant:
Anthony Jackson, Gaylon Lay, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ethridge v. Goodwin
as 3:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ethridge
Defendant:
Brandon Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
